Fast and furious 2 full movie
![fast and furious 2 full movie fast and furious 2 full movie](https://www.uphe.com/sites/default/files/styles/scale__540w_/public/2018/09/2Fast2Furious_4k_BackArt_191329065266.png)
Nonetheless, a really good movie with solid acting and great action. "That Yenko will snap a speedo in 5 seconds" is an example of the type of dialogue that doesn't actually feel genuine in its placement in the film. The only negatives were that some of the action sequences were a little overboard (Dukes of Hazard jump for example) and the dialogue had too much street car jargon to the extent that some of it felt forced. The cinematic effects were much better in this film also. It was a very serious film and while that's great, Tyrese's character, Roman Pearce, added some great laughs at some unexpected moments.
![fast and furious 2 full movie fast and furious 2 full movie](https://i.pinimg.com/236x/7e/42/67/7e42678f6480dbfdd2fd25e7e3b2737d--paul-walker-movies-watch-movies.jpg)
If there's one thing the first film lacked it's that there wasn't much humor. The cast was great once again with Paul Walker returning to his role as Brian O'Connor and Tyrese Gibson and Eva Mendes adding new character dynamics. Johnson is already the type of image-conscious actor to have a contract stipulating how much he gets beaten up onscreen, so it wouldn't be a stretch to imagine him having another clause stipulating that he can never die.Reviewed by Bruce722 8 / 10 Not as good as the first but still entertaining.Ģ Fast 2 Furious isn't quite as good as the first film but it's still a really good movie in its own right. If they killed off Hobbs, that would give him a definitive ending, but it would also rather conflict with the idea of Hobbs walking off into the sunset (unless Johnson is just speaking in extremely loose metaphors). I'm thinking of two specific examples here: Iron Man is one, but another is more recent. In recent years, we've seen other big franchises kill off major heroes to give a sense of closure to their arcs and provide an out for the stars playing those heroes (who had made no secret in the press of wanting to be done with their characters). But maybe I'm just reading into these comments too much? It seems more like Johnson and Diesel are just the antithesis of each other and this is part of that - Johnson's way of saying he's not going to do things like his rival "alpha," as he's called Diesel before. I said, 'We have an opportunity here to go against the grain and let's disrupt things a little bit and let's create a movie within the Fast & Furious world that is unexpected.' " "In this case, I wanted to and still want to do the quintessential Hobbs movie that, again without giving it away, that you watch a man walk off into the sunset. it would be the antithesis of what Fast & Furious movies generally are in that they continue to go on and go on and go on. ' And I pitched, and it would be, without giving it away. "When it comes to Hobbs and Shaw, which we loved and loved making that movie, there's an idea that I had that I called Donna Langley, called our writer Chris Morgan, our producer Hiram Garcia, and I said, 'I have this idea and this direction for. Speaking to Sirius XM (via CBR), Johnson teased an idea for a "Hobbs & Shaw" sequel that would give his character, Luke Hobbs, a definitive ending. Of course, outside the main series, the franchise now extends to include the spin-off film "Hobbs & Shaw," starring Johnson and Jason Statham. Over the summer, he confirmed that he is done with the "Fast & Furious" film series. Or is there? Johnson has had an ongoing feud with franchise star and producer Vin Diesel, and he most recently said that he regrets his part in making that feud public. There's no end in sight to the saga of Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson and the "Fast and Furious" franchise.